Archive for October, 2008

Bar Stool Economics

Douglas Wilson at Blog and Mablog posted a forward he ran across. I think it does a really good job of explaining a bit of the tax situation that we are in.

——————————

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. ‘Since you are all such good customers, he said, ‘I’m going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men – the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his ‘fair share?’

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man’s bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.

And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

The seventh now paid $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

‘I only got a dollar out of the $20′, declared the sixth man.

He pointed to the tenth man,’ but he got $10!’

‘Yeah, that’s right’, exclaimed the fifth man. ‘I only saved a dollar, too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more than I!’

‘That’s true!!’ shouted the seventh man. ‘Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!’

‘Wait a minute,’ yelled the first four men in unison. ‘We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!’

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

To my friends who are considering voting for Barack Obama

As you are my friends you know that it is not in my personality to desire to offend and yet I am compelled to risk offense (even of friends) rather than remain silent at the continued death of well over one million unborn children per year.

Please understand that a vote for almost any democrat candidate (with the blessed exception of a few) at every level of government including a vote for Barack Obama is almost guaranteed to lead to the greater availability and likelihood of the killing of unborn children.

Therefore, to vote for a pro-choice candidate and specifically for Barack Obama is to become complicit in the death of millions.  That is the nature of the democratic process.  When you and I vote it is a vote by the people for the people therefore we each share in any guilt brought upon our nations by our elected officials.  And make no mistake I am aware that there is plenty of guilt to go around.

Specifically as it relates to the election of Barack Obama there is no way to rationalize his promise to sign into law the Freedom of Choice Act with a desire to reduce the number of abortions.

“The FOCA establishes the right to an abortion as a fundamental right, ensuring that abortion rights would remain in force even if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned.  The act would also repeal provisions that limit federal funding of abortion, strip doctors of “conscience clauses” that allow them not to perform abortions, and nullify state provisions that allow for waiting periods, counseling, and parental notification when a minor is involved.”
– Albert Mohler –

Most of you, my friends, are fellow disciples of Jesus Christ.  I cannot make my conviction any more clear than this.  I cannot fathom that a vote for a candidate who wants to further codify into law the right to destroy the unborn is in any way faithful following of the way or the kingdom of Christ.  Is the a salvation issue?  No.  Is this an issue of faithful discipleship?  Absolutely.

Thank you for allowing me to speak.  May God have mercy upon the unborn in American and may God grant conviction within His people as we approach the end of this election season.

The Lord Bless You & Keep You,
Your friend, Jeremiah Fyffe